<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At Flourish and Blotts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hpcompanion.com</link>
	<description>the story, the beauty, and the magic of harry potter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-13907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[May]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-13907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something to Remember: Percy&#039;s attitude can be inferred as suspicious in this chapter. Even his brothers notice something odd about him - he didn&#039;t gloat as much about his twelve OWLs, he locks himself up in his room all day, and he keeps on writing letters. Of course, the real reason for his behavior is, in fact, nothing worrisome at all. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to Remember: Percy&#8217;s attitude can be inferred as suspicious in this chapter. Even his brothers notice something odd about him &#8211; he didn&#8217;t gloat as much about his twelve OWLs, he locks himself up in his room all day, and he keeps on writing letters. Of course, the real reason for his behavior is, in fact, nothing worrisome at all. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toshella</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-13861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toshella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-13861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just occurred to me - the Weasleys are buying Ginny&#039;s textbooks secondhand, and purchase &quot;a very old, very battered copy of A Beginner’s Guide to Transfiguration&quot;.  Shouldn&#039;t she be able to use one of her brothers&#039; old books?  Even if Ron is still using his copy (we didn&#039;t see a second year guide to Transfiguration on the book list this year), surely Percy has moved on to a more advanced textbook by now!  It can&#039;t be an editions issue, because the book they buy is described as very old anyway.
Anyway, not a big deal, but since the Weasleys are trying to save where they can, you&#039;d think they&#039;d be passing textbooks down the line...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just occurred to me &#8211; the Weasleys are buying Ginny&#8217;s textbooks secondhand, and purchase &#8220;a very old, very battered copy of A Beginner’s Guide to Transfiguration&#8221;.  Shouldn&#8217;t she be able to use one of her brothers&#8217; old books?  Even if Ron is still using his copy (we didn&#8217;t see a second year guide to Transfiguration on the book list this year), surely Percy has moved on to a more advanced textbook by now!  It can&#8217;t be an editions issue, because the book they buy is described as very old anyway.<br />
Anyway, not a big deal, but since the Weasleys are trying to save where they can, you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d be passing textbooks down the line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loonytick</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-13786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonytick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-13786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: the privacy issue--Remember, Molly keeps tabs on her family in a similar way. She&#039;s got that charmed &quot;clock&quot; that indicates where each Weasly is, more or less. I think that, to her, the fact that Dumbledore is keeping track of Harry&#039;s location is an indication that D&#039;dore feels as protective of him as she does of her husband and children. Other wizzards may not have reacted as warmly to that information, for all we know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the privacy issue&#8211;Remember, Molly keeps tabs on her family in a similar way. She&#8217;s got that charmed &#8220;clock&#8221; that indicates where each Weasly is, more or less. I think that, to her, the fact that Dumbledore is keeping track of Harry&#8217;s location is an indication that D&#8217;dore feels as protective of him as she does of her husband and children. Other wizzards may not have reacted as warmly to that information, for all we know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-12967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-12967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Andrea I was just going to quote the same sentence. It breaks my heart every time I read it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrea I was just going to quote the same sentence. It breaks my heart every time I read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kearns</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-10746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kearns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-10746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewis, this isn&#039;t the most popular thing I&#039;ve ever written, but I tried to take this question on in an essay: http://hpcompanion.com/essays/csessay

Some food for thought, at least. I do think that it&#039;s unlikely Lucius just happened to have the diary on him, and just happened to decide to give it to Ginny. He had a plan for that diary that day, the question is just whether giving it to Ginny specifically *was* that plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lewis, this isn&#8217;t the most popular thing I&#8217;ve ever written, but I tried to take this question on in an essay: <a href="http://hpcompanion.com/essays/csessay" rel="nofollow">http://hpcompanion.com/essays/csessay</a></p>
<p>Some food for thought, at least. I do think that it&#8217;s unlikely Lucius just happened to have the diary on him, and just happened to decide to give it to Ginny. He had a plan for that diary that day, the question is just whether giving it to Ginny specifically *was* that plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-10741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-10741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is some two years after the original comments, but I don&#039;t believe Lucius&#039; &#039;important business&#039; was the Weasleys, keeping in mind the fact that the Weasleys had arrived in the Leaky Cauldron just seconds before Harry appeared in Borgin and Bourkes. Lucius could not have known that the Weasleys were even in Diagon Alley that day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is some two years after the original comments, but I don&#8217;t believe Lucius&#8217; &#8216;important business&#8217; was the Weasleys, keeping in mind the fact that the Weasleys had arrived in the Leaky Cauldron just seconds before Harry appeared in Borgin and Bourkes. Lucius could not have known that the Weasleys were even in Diagon Alley that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-10280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-10280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I always thought that the owls magically found whomever the letter was addressed to. I mean, I know Arthur says &quot;Dumbledore already knows you&#039;re here, Harry&quot; but isn&#039;t Hedwig able to find Sirius in GoF, while he&#039;s constantly on the move? I suppose it could depend on the bird, but I&#039;ve always thought that the different pets in the Wizarding World were supposed to have certain magical abilities, mundane or not. Perhaps what Arthur said is a faux pas on JKR&#039;s part, for it being early in the series? Sometimes I really wish she would come on this site and clear up some of these questions for us!

And about the vanishing cabinet, I always assumed it teleported one from one cabinet to the next, not actually forming a literal passage. But I agree with you, John, I think the cabinet would have to be closed all the way for it to send Harry, either between the two, or into Limbo, depending on whether the cabinet in B&amp;B was broken or not. It&#039;s also plausible that there would need to be some kind of magic used to activate them, however I doubt when Montague was shoved in, that whoever did the shoving (I think Fred &amp; George?) would know of these words. Although (and I hate to use the movies as a point of reference, but) in the movie for HBP, Malfoy uses the term &quot;Harmonia Nocterne Passus&quot; to activate the cabinets. Though, this is the movie, so it can&#039;t exactly be called accurate to the universe 100%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I always thought that the owls magically found whomever the letter was addressed to. I mean, I know Arthur says &#8220;Dumbledore already knows you&#8217;re here, Harry&#8221; but isn&#8217;t Hedwig able to find Sirius in GoF, while he&#8217;s constantly on the move? I suppose it could depend on the bird, but I&#8217;ve always thought that the different pets in the Wizarding World were supposed to have certain magical abilities, mundane or not. Perhaps what Arthur said is a faux pas on JKR&#8217;s part, for it being early in the series? Sometimes I really wish she would come on this site and clear up some of these questions for us!</p>
<p>And about the vanishing cabinet, I always assumed it teleported one from one cabinet to the next, not actually forming a literal passage. But I agree with you, John, I think the cabinet would have to be closed all the way for it to send Harry, either between the two, or into Limbo, depending on whether the cabinet in B&amp;B was broken or not. It&#8217;s also plausible that there would need to be some kind of magic used to activate them, however I doubt when Montague was shoved in, that whoever did the shoving (I think Fred &amp; George?) would know of these words. Although (and I hate to use the movies as a point of reference, but) in the movie for HBP, Malfoy uses the term &#8220;Harmonia Nocterne Passus&#8221; to activate the cabinets. Though, this is the movie, so it can&#8217;t exactly be called accurate to the universe 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace has Victory</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-10214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grace has Victory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-10214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;John&lt;/b&gt;, I know we can&#039;t trust &lt;b&gt;JKR&lt;/b&gt;&#039;s arithmetic, but I think Arthur is only about four years older than Lucius, so they probably did overlap at Hogwarts. (Lucius is 41 in autumn 1995, suggesting he was born between September 1953 and August 1954. Arthur and Molly were married &quot;suddenly&quot; in February 1970, although they had been a couple since school. This suggests they had not been out of school very long when they eloped. I will therefore tentatively suggest that they were born in 1950, and that Arthur (born February) was only just 20 and Molly (born October) still 19 when they married.

Arthur and Narcissa are second cousins once removed. That&#039;s a sufficiently distant relationship should they wish to avoid one another, but they probably did have some acquaintance in common and move in the same circles occasionally.

&lt;b&gt;BestSeriesEver&lt;/b&gt;, it seems to me that the Trace detects all magic performed in the vicinity. The Ministry doesn&#039;t worry about it if an adult wizard lives in the household, but if a school-aged child is the only wizard inhabitant, or if it happens in a public Muggle area, that&#039;s when the law is considered to have been broken.

But Fred &amp; George? It&#039;s possible you can do a certain amount of potions without strictly doing &quot;magic&quot;, in the same way you can use a magical gadget without casting a spell yourself. I think Molly just &lt;i&gt;hoped&lt;/i&gt; that was the sort of thing they were doing and didn&#039;t ask too many questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>John</b>, I know we can&#8217;t trust <b>JKR</b>&#8216;s arithmetic, but I think Arthur is only about four years older than Lucius, so they probably did overlap at Hogwarts. (Lucius is 41 in autumn 1995, suggesting he was born between September 1953 and August 1954. Arthur and Molly were married &#8220;suddenly&#8221; in February 1970, although they had been a couple since school. This suggests they had not been out of school very long when they eloped. I will therefore tentatively suggest that they were born in 1950, and that Arthur (born February) was only just 20 and Molly (born October) still 19 when they married.</p>
<p>Arthur and Narcissa are second cousins once removed. That&#8217;s a sufficiently distant relationship should they wish to avoid one another, but they probably did have some acquaintance in common and move in the same circles occasionally.</p>
<p><b>BestSeriesEver</b>, it seems to me that the Trace detects all magic performed in the vicinity. The Ministry doesn&#8217;t worry about it if an adult wizard lives in the household, but if a school-aged child is the only wizard inhabitant, or if it happens in a public Muggle area, that&#8217;s when the law is considered to have been broken.</p>
<p>But Fred &amp; George? It&#8217;s possible you can do a certain amount of potions without strictly doing &#8220;magic&#8221;, in the same way you can use a magical gadget without casting a spell yourself. I think Molly just <i>hoped</i> that was the sort of thing they were doing and didn&#8217;t ask too many questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Powell</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-10046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Powell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 03:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-10046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BestSeriesEver : 

Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but from what I remember, the trace does detect underage magic, it&#039;s just that there is so much magic that goes on in a wizarding household, from cleaning to repairs to accidental magic that the kids may do, that they really can&#039;t distinguish who is responsible for what in that setting.

Also, I was under the impression that the ministry only punished kids when the magic was performed intentionally and/or in the presence of muggles, thereby violation the Wizard Privacy Act(?).

So, if I am correct, the only reason Harry was punished was because it was in front of Muggles AND intentional. 

However, this doesn&#039;t explain why Harry was blamed when, in fact, it was Dobby, who wasn&#039;t even supposed to be there. The only real explanation that I can think of is that either, A) The trace simply detects magic, weather or not it was intentional, and which wizards were there, so, Harry, being the only wizard, was blamed, or B) Dobby did some form of deep, house-elf magic (like we will see him do later on in the series), that tricked the trace. 

The second option is the one that I personally subscribe to, just because Dobby was trying to keep out of serious trouble and get Harry expelled at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BestSeriesEver : </p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but from what I remember, the trace does detect underage magic, it&#8217;s just that there is so much magic that goes on in a wizarding household, from cleaning to repairs to accidental magic that the kids may do, that they really can&#8217;t distinguish who is responsible for what in that setting.</p>
<p>Also, I was under the impression that the ministry only punished kids when the magic was performed intentionally and/or in the presence of muggles, thereby violation the Wizard Privacy Act(?).</p>
<p>So, if I am correct, the only reason Harry was punished was because it was in front of Muggles AND intentional. </p>
<p>However, this doesn&#8217;t explain why Harry was blamed when, in fact, it was Dobby, who wasn&#8217;t even supposed to be there. The only real explanation that I can think of is that either, A) The trace simply detects magic, weather or not it was intentional, and which wizards were there, so, Harry, being the only wizard, was blamed, or B) Dobby did some form of deep, house-elf magic (like we will see him do later on in the series), that tricked the trace. </p>
<p>The second option is the one that I personally subscribe to, just because Dobby was trying to keep out of serious trouble and get Harry expelled at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Koontz</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/cs/cs4/#comment-8071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April Koontz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=1394#comment-8071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have been wrong for years about how J. K. Rowling came up with Lockhearts name. I learned in college that there was a memory psychologist named Lockheart and I was sure (due to Gilderoy&#039;s speciality) that she had to have gotten the name from the psychologist. It&#039;s still a neat fact, even if it isn&#039;t where the name came from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have been wrong for years about how J. K. Rowling came up with Lockhearts name. I learned in college that there was a memory psychologist named Lockheart and I was sure (due to Gilderoy&#8217;s speciality) that she had to have gotten the name from the psychologist. It&#8217;s still a neat fact, even if it isn&#8217;t where the name came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

