<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ministry of Magic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hpcompanion.com</link>
	<description>the story, the beauty, and the magic of harry potter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-14778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-14778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only issue for Dumbledore if he used the wand registration instrument would (Besides the potential issue regarding time of use Nienke highlighted) would be the identification of the core. I know it doesn&#039;t mention it in the books, I can&#039;t remember when but JKR said in an interview the core is a Thestral Hair (What else would you expect for a wand made by death(?)). It is not one of the standard cores used by Ollivander and we know from GoF Ollivander has experimented with other cores, like he mentions Veela hair makes a wand too temperamental. So it definitely would have drawn the curiosity of the security guard and possibly of fans/enemies of Dumbledore who sneaked over to the security desk to read said information about the wand of their hero/enemy. It is possible the unique use of Thestral hair may be what made Elder wand so powerful and Gregorovitch may have discovered this if he had researched the wand longer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only issue for Dumbledore if he used the wand registration instrument would (Besides the potential issue regarding time of use Nienke highlighted) would be the identification of the core. I know it doesn&#8217;t mention it in the books, I can&#8217;t remember when but JKR said in an interview the core is a Thestral Hair (What else would you expect for a wand made by death(?)). It is not one of the standard cores used by Ollivander and we know from GoF Ollivander has experimented with other cores, like he mentions Veela hair makes a wand too temperamental. So it definitely would have drawn the curiosity of the security guard and possibly of fans/enemies of Dumbledore who sneaked over to the security desk to read said information about the wand of their hero/enemy. It is possible the unique use of Thestral hair may be what made Elder wand so powerful and Gregorovitch may have discovered this if he had researched the wand longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nienke</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-12582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nienke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-12582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jose Lopes says:
December 2, 2009 at 3:45 am
Harry’s wand was checked by an instrument when he arrived at the Ministry. If this is standard procedure for all visitors I wonder what this device would say upon checking Dumbledore’s Elder Wand?

I wonder why everybody is convinced that Dumbledore doesn&#039;t want to have his want checked or even seen. All the instrument would say was that  the wand was made from elderwood, right? And we know THE elder wand wasn&#039;t the only wand made of elder. In DH Ron says about elder wands something like &quot;wand of elder, never prosper&quot;. 
The instrument also states the time the wand is in use. This might cause a problem for Dumbledore, because this elder wand has been in use for hundreds of years. Though it is not uncommon for wands to be passed on to others (isn&#039;t Ron&#039;s first wand an old wand from one of his brothers, like his pet?) hundreds of years seems more than a bit unlikely. However, Dumbledore has only been using the wand for a shorter time. So the real question here is: does the instrument say how long the wand has been in use, or how long the user uses the wand? That answer would tell us whether Dumbledore would avoid these instruments or not. On hiding the wand from other people, nobody really knows what &#039;the deathstick&#039; or &#039;the elder wand&#039; looks like apart from its previous owners, right? 
Dumbledore wouldn&#039;t have to hide and switch, but I like the idea that he could switch when performing magic he feels more comfortable doing with his own wand, if any.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose Lopes says:<br />
December 2, 2009 at 3:45 am<br />
Harry’s wand was checked by an instrument when he arrived at the Ministry. If this is standard procedure for all visitors I wonder what this device would say upon checking Dumbledore’s Elder Wand?</p>
<p>I wonder why everybody is convinced that Dumbledore doesn&#8217;t want to have his want checked or even seen. All the instrument would say was that  the wand was made from elderwood, right? And we know THE elder wand wasn&#8217;t the only wand made of elder. In DH Ron says about elder wands something like &#8220;wand of elder, never prosper&#8221;.<br />
The instrument also states the time the wand is in use. This might cause a problem for Dumbledore, because this elder wand has been in use for hundreds of years. Though it is not uncommon for wands to be passed on to others (isn&#8217;t Ron&#8217;s first wand an old wand from one of his brothers, like his pet?) hundreds of years seems more than a bit unlikely. However, Dumbledore has only been using the wand for a shorter time. So the real question here is: does the instrument say how long the wand has been in use, or how long the user uses the wand? That answer would tell us whether Dumbledore would avoid these instruments or not. On hiding the wand from other people, nobody really knows what &#8216;the deathstick&#8217; or &#8216;the elder wand&#8217; looks like apart from its previous owners, right?<br />
Dumbledore wouldn&#8217;t have to hide and switch, but I like the idea that he could switch when performing magic he feels more comfortable doing with his own wand, if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reagan</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-12527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 22:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-12527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the photographs ability to move and connect with reality. We know that the pictures can interact with each other in the same building, and the person can travel between pictures of themselves. So perhaps  (since Percy works within the ministry as well) the family-picture-Percy has moved between the pictures of himself in his own office and Arther&#039;s (because come on... cant you see Percy having a picture of himself in his office... with his head boy badge or something?) and could feel the tension between the two family members. So its not that the picture-Percy himself could feel the tension- but he could see it in the offices around him.

 Similarly picture-Percy may have moved between the picture in Arther&#039;s office to a picture at the Burrow and again felt the tension when his family talks about him. (or lack of talking about him!)

Another random side-note about picture&#039;s ability to move between paintings in the same building... How come none of the more. .. erm...interesting... picture subjects are ever sharing the frame with the headmaster/mistresses in Dumbledore&#039;s office? Is there a level of picture-respect that you don&#039;t enter someone&#039;s frame unless invited?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the photographs ability to move and connect with reality. We know that the pictures can interact with each other in the same building, and the person can travel between pictures of themselves. So perhaps  (since Percy works within the ministry as well) the family-picture-Percy has moved between the pictures of himself in his own office and Arther&#8217;s (because come on&#8230; cant you see Percy having a picture of himself in his office&#8230; with his head boy badge or something?) and could feel the tension between the two family members. So its not that the picture-Percy himself could feel the tension- but he could see it in the offices around him.</p>
<p> Similarly picture-Percy may have moved between the picture in Arther&#8217;s office to a picture at the Burrow and again felt the tension when his family talks about him. (or lack of talking about him!)</p>
<p>Another random side-note about picture&#8217;s ability to move between paintings in the same building&#8230; How come none of the more. .. erm&#8230;interesting&#8230; picture subjects are ever sharing the frame with the headmaster/mistresses in Dumbledore&#8217;s office? Is there a level of picture-respect that you don&#8217;t enter someone&#8217;s frame unless invited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-8936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what would be considered a ludicrous patent. Quick-Quotes Quill? Deluminator? Moody&#039;s magical eye? Quidditch related items?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what would be considered a ludicrous patent. Quick-Quotes Quill? Deluminator? Moody&#8217;s magical eye? Quidditch related items?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kearns</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kearns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[elizabethauthor, I&#039;m not sure where you live, but I&#039;m in the US and I think almost every phone I&#039;ve ever seen includes the letters (including the old rotary phones we had growing up). It&#039;s also fairly standard procedure here for companies to give out phone numbers as words - the theatre I work for uses a word for the last four digits of its box office number, for example, to help people remember it. I don&#039;t know that the same is true in Britain, but I would guess that it is.

I&#039;d also say that as long as the letters are on the phone in the phone booth, it might not matter whether wizards have heard of it before - they could simply figure it out :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elizabethauthor, I&#8217;m not sure where you live, but I&#8217;m in the US and I think almost every phone I&#8217;ve ever seen includes the letters (including the old rotary phones we had growing up). It&#8217;s also fairly standard procedure here for companies to give out phone numbers as words &#8211; the theatre I work for uses a word for the last four digits of its box office number, for example, to help people remember it. I don&#8217;t know that the same is true in Britain, but I would guess that it is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also say that as long as the letters are on the phone in the phone booth, it might not matter whether wizards have heard of it before &#8211; they could simply figure it out :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have the letters on payphones here in the UK and have for as long as I can remember. The ministry wanted a means of entering the Ministry which wouldn&#039;t attract attention from muggles. They selected a payphone for this task and then needed a number for people to dial to make sure the person was a wizard. Looking at the keypad they would notice the letters. What better word to use than &#039;magic&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have the letters on payphones here in the UK and have for as long as I can remember. The ministry wanted a means of entering the Ministry which wouldn&#8217;t attract attention from muggles. They selected a payphone for this task and then needed a number for people to dial to make sure the person was a wizard. Looking at the keypad they would notice the letters. What better word to use than &#8216;magic&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabethauthor</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elizabethauthor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She says before looking at her own house phone and seeing the letters. But it is a fairly new phone and I&#039;m sure my old one didn&#039;t have them. And I don&#039;t recall ever seeing them on a payphone before. Then again I could be wrong about that too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She says before looking at her own house phone and seeing the letters. But it is a fairly new phone and I&#8217;m sure my old one didn&#8217;t have them. And I don&#8217;t recall ever seeing them on a payphone before. Then again I could be wrong about that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabethauthor</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elizabethauthor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation. It&#039;s just that apart from on mobiles, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen letters on a phone before. And since wizards don&#039;t normally use phones, and certainly wouldn&#039;t use mobiles, would they even know about the numbers-letters thing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation. It&#8217;s just that apart from on mobiles, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen letters on a phone before. And since wizards don&#8217;t normally use phones, and certainly wouldn&#8217;t use mobiles, would they even know about the numbers-letters thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magali</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the picture, remember the one with Penelope Clearwater in book 3. Someone spilled tea on Penelope&#039;s picture (on her nose) so she was hiding behind the frame. I think someone (Fred, George or Ginny…) did or said something to the Percy on the picture and he wanted to hide. 
Anyway, I love this site. Since the last book, I take some distance from the books and now that I&#039;m reading them again, I&#039;m really happy to find some new theories and ideas about the books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the picture, remember the one with Penelope Clearwater in book 3. Someone spilled tea on Penelope&#8217;s picture (on her nose) so she was hiding behind the frame. I think someone (Fred, George or Ginny…) did or said something to the Percy on the picture and he wanted to hide.<br />
Anyway, I love this site. Since the last book, I take some distance from the books and now that I&#8217;m reading them again, I&#8217;m really happy to find some new theories and ideas about the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/op/op7/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=4291#comment-5292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@elizabethauthor: Amy&#039;s explanation is best, but I wanted to also mention that texting is based on the system she described (3 -4 letters assigned to each number on a phone keypad). Hope that helps!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@elizabethauthor: Amy&#8217;s explanation is best, but I wanted to also mention that texting is based on the system she described (3 -4 letters assigned to each number on a phone keypad). Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

