<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hermione&#8217;s Secret</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hpcompanion.com</link>
	<description>the story, the beauty, and the magic of harry potter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-23236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-23236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Amanda - I&#039;ve wondered the same thing about the link between a patronus and an Animagus form.  The only time in the books we see an Animagus cast a patronus is in DH30, when Prof. McGonagall casts three patronuses to summons the other heads of house - and the patronuses are indeed cats with spectacle markings.  So I think you must be right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Amanda &#8211; I&#8217;ve wondered the same thing about the link between a patronus and an Animagus form.  The only time in the books we see an Animagus cast a patronus is in DH30, when Prof. McGonagall casts three patronuses to summons the other heads of house &#8211; and the patronuses are indeed cats with spectacle markings.  So I think you must be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carlton</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-16687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Carlton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-16687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pardon the intrusion, but this evening I found myself thinking somewhat differently about the patronus than I had before, and wanted to float this.  My inspiration was Stephanie Zacharek&#039;s review of the movie *Prisoner of Azkaban,* which began with a quote from E. T. A. Hoffman to the effect that the essence of romanticism is &quot;infinite longing.&quot;  [Her larger claim was that Cuaron had for the first time recognized the romanticism at the heart of the Potter books].  That got me to thinking specifically about the movie version of the scene in which Lupin teaches Harry to cast the patronus.  In the movie version, the memory that works is not discovering he&#039;s a wizard or departing Privet Drive; it&#039;s the memory of seeing his parents in the Mirror of Erised.  It wasn&#039;t &quot;happy, exactly,&quot; but it was powerful.  That, in turn, led me to rethink what is going on when Harry casts the stag patronus in this chapter.  Earlier, he&#039;d been convinced that his Dad had come and saved him and Sirius from the dementors, and here he&#039;s at first convinced that his Dad will come to him on the opposite shore of the lake.  Of course, he winds up casting the patronus himself, and I&#039;d long figured that he&#039;d concluded that it was up to him--that he could no longer hope for a parental protector.  Now I&#039;m not so sure.  Now I believe that he was able to cast such a powerful patronus because the most powerful emotions aren&#039;t those of happy memories--they&#039;re those of longing for that which you think would make you happy.  And that longing isn&#039;t for some *thing*--it&#039;s a longing for some *one.*  In that sense, James Potter really *is* present on that lakeshore, as the embodiment of Harry&#039;s longing for family [Just as, in the epigram from William Penn at the start of DH, the dead never die if they live within us].  Harry&#039;s patronus, thus, is a projection not of a happy memory [As was noted in the HPC commentary on the &quot;Patronus&quot; chapter, his happy memories are pretty thin gruel] but of that &quot;infinite longing&quot; of which Hoffman speaks.  That would also explain two of the other really emotionally powerful patroni in the books:  Tonks&#039;s wolf and Snape&#039;s silver doe.  And that view of them gives them an emotional power *for me* that they&#039;d never had before.  Has this been said before?  Does it make sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the intrusion, but this evening I found myself thinking somewhat differently about the patronus than I had before, and wanted to float this.  My inspiration was Stephanie Zacharek&#8217;s review of the movie *Prisoner of Azkaban,* which began with a quote from E. T. A. Hoffman to the effect that the essence of romanticism is &#8220;infinite longing.&#8221;  [Her larger claim was that Cuaron had for the first time recognized the romanticism at the heart of the Potter books].  That got me to thinking specifically about the movie version of the scene in which Lupin teaches Harry to cast the patronus.  In the movie version, the memory that works is not discovering he&#8217;s a wizard or departing Privet Drive; it&#8217;s the memory of seeing his parents in the Mirror of Erised.  It wasn&#8217;t &#8220;happy, exactly,&#8221; but it was powerful.  That, in turn, led me to rethink what is going on when Harry casts the stag patronus in this chapter.  Earlier, he&#8217;d been convinced that his Dad had come and saved him and Sirius from the dementors, and here he&#8217;s at first convinced that his Dad will come to him on the opposite shore of the lake.  Of course, he winds up casting the patronus himself, and I&#8217;d long figured that he&#8217;d concluded that it was up to him&#8211;that he could no longer hope for a parental protector.  Now I&#8217;m not so sure.  Now I believe that he was able to cast such a powerful patronus because the most powerful emotions aren&#8217;t those of happy memories&#8211;they&#8217;re those of longing for that which you think would make you happy.  And that longing isn&#8217;t for some *thing*&#8211;it&#8217;s a longing for some *one.*  In that sense, James Potter really *is* present on that lakeshore, as the embodiment of Harry&#8217;s longing for family [Just as, in the epigram from William Penn at the start of DH, the dead never die if they live within us].  Harry&#8217;s patronus, thus, is a projection not of a happy memory [As was noted in the HPC commentary on the "Patronus" chapter, his happy memories are pretty thin gruel] but of that &#8220;infinite longing&#8221; of which Hoffman speaks.  That would also explain two of the other really emotionally powerful patroni in the books:  Tonks&#8217;s wolf and Snape&#8217;s silver doe.  And that view of them gives them an emotional power *for me* that they&#8217;d never had before.  Has this been said before?  Does it make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kearns</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-16251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kearns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-16251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[willie, thanks for your comment! sharpfish&#039;s drawing is one of my favorite HP drawings of all time. I remember I literally gasped when I first saw it (and I was well into the project by the time I came upon it, so I knew how different it was).

In terms of the discussion, one thing you&#039;ll find from time to time is people jumping back into a discussion - lots of readers have subscribed to the comments on a particular page, so if somebody posts they&#039;ll get an e-mail and pop back in to share their thoughts again. So that may at least help some. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>willie, thanks for your comment! sharpfish&#8217;s drawing is one of my favorite HP drawings of all time. I remember I literally gasped when I first saw it (and I was well into the project by the time I came upon it, so I knew how different it was).</p>
<p>In terms of the discussion, one thing you&#8217;ll find from time to time is people jumping back into a discussion &#8211; lots of readers have subscribed to the comments on a particular page, so if somebody posts they&#8217;ll get an e-mail and pop back in to share their thoughts again. So that may at least help some. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willie</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-15532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[willie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-15532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know probably no one but you, John, will read this but I had to comment on the outstanding artwork for this chapter. There are two that really move me: sharpfish’s picture of the Patronus and glockgal {Black &amp; Buckbeak) are breathtaking. I selfishly wish the discussions would start up again because I&#039;m sure these people have reread the books and have further insight. Having originally followed my church&#039;s advice about HP being evil, I only got into HP two years ago (my grown son had kept after me to give them a chance). Now, I&#039;m constantly relating some insight from the books to my senior citizen friends .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know probably no one but you, John, will read this but I had to comment on the outstanding artwork for this chapter. There are two that really move me: sharpfish’s picture of the Patronus and glockgal {Black &amp; Buckbeak) are breathtaking. I selfishly wish the discussions would start up again because I&#8217;m sure these people have reread the books and have further insight. Having originally followed my church&#8217;s advice about HP being evil, I only got into HP two years ago (my grown son had kept after me to give them a chance). Now, I&#8217;m constantly relating some insight from the books to my senior citizen friends .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-13537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amanda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-13537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sidenote regarding Patronuses and Animagi; it seems like these two kinds of magic has something in common - they both seem to be a kind of magic that conjures an animal that is the animal form of the wizard who casts the spell, right? I mean, at least I&#039;m quite sure Sirius&#039; patronus would be a dog, and Pettigrews would be a rat. I don&#039;t know, these two just seem to be a bit similiar regarding the animal aspect. Does anybody else have thoughs on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sidenote regarding Patronuses and Animagi; it seems like these two kinds of magic has something in common &#8211; they both seem to be a kind of magic that conjures an animal that is the animal form of the wizard who casts the spell, right? I mean, at least I&#8217;m quite sure Sirius&#8217; patronus would be a dog, and Pettigrews would be a rat. I don&#8217;t know, these two just seem to be a bit similiar regarding the animal aspect. Does anybody else have thoughs on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kearns</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-13334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Kearns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-13334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Todd, that&#039;s very well put. To build on what you said: You can&#039;t go back in time to stop Voldemort killing Cedric, because if you DO, then Cedric&#039;s never died - and therefore you aren&#039;t aware of a need to go back in time to prevent it from happening!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, that&#8217;s very well put. To build on what you said: You can&#8217;t go back in time to stop Voldemort killing Cedric, because if you DO, then Cedric&#8217;s never died &#8211; and therefore you aren&#8217;t aware of a need to go back in time to prevent it from happening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-13297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-13297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The events in Harry and Hermione&#039;s time travel adventure (such as Harry summoning the Patronus that he&#039;d seen before he went back in time) could answer the question often raised about Time Turners: why didn&#039;t the characters (before the Time Turners were all destroyed in Book Five) use them to go back in time to change things for the better (like stopping Voldemort and his followers from killing people?).

Apparently time travelers were already in the past all along, and the things that they did were things that showed themselves even before they went back.  So you can&#039;t go back and, say, stop Voldemort from killing Cedric Diggory, because nobody stopped him from killing Cedric.  But you can conjure up a Patronus to drive the dememtors away from your younger self, if it had already happened.  (I hope I&#039;m making myself clear.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The events in Harry and Hermione&#8217;s time travel adventure (such as Harry summoning the Patronus that he&#8217;d seen before he went back in time) could answer the question often raised about Time Turners: why didn&#8217;t the characters (before the Time Turners were all destroyed in Book Five) use them to go back in time to change things for the better (like stopping Voldemort and his followers from killing people?).</p>
<p>Apparently time travelers were already in the past all along, and the things that they did were things that showed themselves even before they went back.  So you can&#8217;t go back and, say, stop Voldemort from killing Cedric Diggory, because nobody stopped him from killing Cedric.  But you can conjure up a Patronus to drive the dememtors away from your younger self, if it had already happened.  (I hope I&#8217;m making myself clear.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toshella</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-11643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toshella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-11643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another late post...  This definitely falls into the category of &quot;using the Time Turner to solve everything&quot; but regarding how Dumbledore knew what to do, I have a mental image in my head of him saying to Hermione and Harry when they get back: &quot;Oh good, everything worked out!  Now please turn back 4 hours and explain it all to me.&quot;  Cracks me up every time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another late post&#8230;  This definitely falls into the category of &#8220;using the Time Turner to solve everything&#8221; but regarding how Dumbledore knew what to do, I have a mental image in my head of him saying to Hermione and Harry when they get back: &#8220;Oh good, everything worked out!  Now please turn back 4 hours and explain it all to me.&#8221;  Cracks me up every time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *spunky*</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-11150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[*spunky*]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-11150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a late post but I just stumbled across this site, and I must say I am very entertained and impressed Mr. Kearns!

However regarding the map and the two Harry/hermiones, I think you may possibly be reading too much in to it.  I don&#039;t think lupin knew any time traveling was going on.  Whether he didn&#039;t see Harry and hermione twice because they were out of bounds of the map, it&#039;s part of the magic of the time turner that they wouldn&#039;t show up or he simply didn&#039;t notice, I don&#039;t think anyone was aware of what happened that night except Dumbledore, Harry, hermione and ron ( after they told him.)



I wonder if they ever even explained to Sirius how he was saved.  Hmm..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a late post but I just stumbled across this site, and I must say I am very entertained and impressed Mr. Kearns!</p>
<p>However regarding the map and the two Harry/hermiones, I think you may possibly be reading too much in to it.  I don&#8217;t think lupin knew any time traveling was going on.  Whether he didn&#8217;t see Harry and hermione twice because they were out of bounds of the map, it&#8217;s part of the magic of the time turner that they wouldn&#8217;t show up or he simply didn&#8217;t notice, I don&#8217;t think anyone was aware of what happened that night except Dumbledore, Harry, hermione and ron ( after they told him.)</p>
<p>I wonder if they ever even explained to Sirius how he was saved.  Hmm..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://hpcompanion.com/pa/pa21/#comment-10617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hpcompanion.com/?page_id=2681#comment-10617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pam, your theory would make sense, if there weren&#039;t clues earlier on about Harry and Hermione already having traveled back in time as we saw events unfold the first time. Such as them hearing the door slamming, and Harry saving himself from the dementors. All those things happened the first time we see them, therefore Harry and Hermione *have* traveled back in time already at that point. Think of the time traveling as a constant loop. It is somewhat confusing (as all time paradoxes are), but it&#039;s a common theme when time travel is written into stories.

As for the idea that the Map wouldn&#039;t have shown two Harry and Hermione dots because Lupin wouldn&#039;t be expecting them, it just doesn&#039;t make sense to me. The Map would be completely useless against watching for &quot;enemies&quot; as you roam the corridors of Hogwarts. Harry would never be *expecting* Filch or Snape to be headed toward him, if he just happened to glance at the Map at the right time. He would see them anyway, because they exist in the school. I don&#039;t think it has anything to do with expecting to see anyone, if they&#039;re there, they show up, cause the Map never lies.

And I agree with lovelyheartedlady. At least to the point that we don&#039;t know just how much the Map shows. We don&#039;t really know what it&#039;s limits are. Harry is always seen thinking &quot;headed toward the Forest&quot; or &quot;headed toward Hogsmeade&quot; but this could just be his knowledge of the area speaking. Or it just says &quot;to the Forest&quot; or &quot;to Hogsmeade&quot; on the side of the map. However, Lupin says he saw Harry, Hermione, and Ron head to Hagrid&#039;s. So doesn&#039;t that mean he would have at least seen the other Harry and Hermione in the broom closet off the Entrance Hall? I think it&#039;s definitely a possibility he saw this, and informed Dumbledore. I think Dumbledore had an idea all year that he would have Harry and co. save Buckbeak from execution, and that&#039;s why he was so amused at the site of what would have been the execution. But he didn&#039;t know just how much this rescue mission would involve. I think he started to put the pieces together, knowing Sirius wouldn&#039;t slash the portrait unless he was mad, since he knows Sirius was a Gryffindor, and then Sirius didn&#039;t kill anyone when he found his way to Harry&#039;s dormitory. He had his thoughts, and then the way events unfolded on June 6th, hearing from Lupin beforehand, talking to Sirius, and seeing Harry and Hermione&#039;s sincerity (obviously not Confunded) he made up his mind that Sirius must be innocent and hatched the complete rescue plan for Harry and Hermione in the end.

And I also think all the teachers must know of Hermione&#039;s Time-Turner, because they must communicate with each other somehow at meal times and in the staff room. I can just see them all discussing how Hermione is coping with her immense workload, McGonagall being proud yet worried, and Snape being a jerk talking about how she&#039;s still an insufferable know-it-all. I think that&#039;s also a part of the reason why Snape is so angry about how things unfold for him in the last chapter. He realized what happened, and it always drives him crazy when Dumbledore allows all of this to happen and let them all get away with these things.

And last but not least, why Dumbledore didn&#039;t go in to help Harry at the Shack. Of course, I&#039;ve already explained that I think Dumbledore already had an idea that Sirius was innocent. He also knew Lupin was going to go in after them, and as I see how Lupin must have been appointed as a defender for Harry, he knew nothing bad would happen to Harry in case Sirius was guilty. He also has always let Harry figure things out for himself unless he&#039;s in serious danger from Voldemort. I don&#039;t think Harry would have learned as much if Dumbledore had interfered, and I think Dumbledore fears that. He wants Harry to experience things for himself, because that&#039;s the best way to grow and learn.I&#039;m sure he must have been extremely worried for his safety that night, but somehow knew Harry would be alright in the end, knowing it&#039;s Harry. He has already seen him go up against Voldemort and protect the Philosopher&#039;s Stone, *and* go into the Chamber of Secrets and come back out, bloodstained and dirty, but safe. He puts a lot of store in Harry&#039;s abilities, and hasn&#039;t been wrong yet.

Sorry about the length. That was huge =P

(Moderated for language)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam, your theory would make sense, if there weren&#8217;t clues earlier on about Harry and Hermione already having traveled back in time as we saw events unfold the first time. Such as them hearing the door slamming, and Harry saving himself from the dementors. All those things happened the first time we see them, therefore Harry and Hermione *have* traveled back in time already at that point. Think of the time traveling as a constant loop. It is somewhat confusing (as all time paradoxes are), but it&#8217;s a common theme when time travel is written into stories.</p>
<p>As for the idea that the Map wouldn&#8217;t have shown two Harry and Hermione dots because Lupin wouldn&#8217;t be expecting them, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. The Map would be completely useless against watching for &#8220;enemies&#8221; as you roam the corridors of Hogwarts. Harry would never be *expecting* Filch or Snape to be headed toward him, if he just happened to glance at the Map at the right time. He would see them anyway, because they exist in the school. I don&#8217;t think it has anything to do with expecting to see anyone, if they&#8217;re there, they show up, cause the Map never lies.</p>
<p>And I agree with lovelyheartedlady. At least to the point that we don&#8217;t know just how much the Map shows. We don&#8217;t really know what it&#8217;s limits are. Harry is always seen thinking &#8220;headed toward the Forest&#8221; or &#8220;headed toward Hogsmeade&#8221; but this could just be his knowledge of the area speaking. Or it just says &#8220;to the Forest&#8221; or &#8220;to Hogsmeade&#8221; on the side of the map. However, Lupin says he saw Harry, Hermione, and Ron head to Hagrid&#8217;s. So doesn&#8217;t that mean he would have at least seen the other Harry and Hermione in the broom closet off the Entrance Hall? I think it&#8217;s definitely a possibility he saw this, and informed Dumbledore. I think Dumbledore had an idea all year that he would have Harry and co. save Buckbeak from execution, and that&#8217;s why he was so amused at the site of what would have been the execution. But he didn&#8217;t know just how much this rescue mission would involve. I think he started to put the pieces together, knowing Sirius wouldn&#8217;t slash the portrait unless he was mad, since he knows Sirius was a Gryffindor, and then Sirius didn&#8217;t kill anyone when he found his way to Harry&#8217;s dormitory. He had his thoughts, and then the way events unfolded on June 6th, hearing from Lupin beforehand, talking to Sirius, and seeing Harry and Hermione&#8217;s sincerity (obviously not Confunded) he made up his mind that Sirius must be innocent and hatched the complete rescue plan for Harry and Hermione in the end.</p>
<p>And I also think all the teachers must know of Hermione&#8217;s Time-Turner, because they must communicate with each other somehow at meal times and in the staff room. I can just see them all discussing how Hermione is coping with her immense workload, McGonagall being proud yet worried, and Snape being a jerk talking about how she&#8217;s still an insufferable know-it-all. I think that&#8217;s also a part of the reason why Snape is so angry about how things unfold for him in the last chapter. He realized what happened, and it always drives him crazy when Dumbledore allows all of this to happen and let them all get away with these things.</p>
<p>And last but not least, why Dumbledore didn&#8217;t go in to help Harry at the Shack. Of course, I&#8217;ve already explained that I think Dumbledore already had an idea that Sirius was innocent. He also knew Lupin was going to go in after them, and as I see how Lupin must have been appointed as a defender for Harry, he knew nothing bad would happen to Harry in case Sirius was guilty. He also has always let Harry figure things out for himself unless he&#8217;s in serious danger from Voldemort. I don&#8217;t think Harry would have learned as much if Dumbledore had interfered, and I think Dumbledore fears that. He wants Harry to experience things for himself, because that&#8217;s the best way to grow and learn.I&#8217;m sure he must have been extremely worried for his safety that night, but somehow knew Harry would be alright in the end, knowing it&#8217;s Harry. He has already seen him go up against Voldemort and protect the Philosopher&#8217;s Stone, *and* go into the Chamber of Secrets and come back out, bloodstained and dirty, but safe. He puts a lot of store in Harry&#8217;s abilities, and hasn&#8217;t been wrong yet.</p>
<p>Sorry about the length. That was huge =P</p>
<p>(Moderated for language)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

